Democratic ValuesHow to start winning the red states.
Posted Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2004, at 4:15 PM ET
Hey, Democrats!
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponOne silver lining in last night's debacle is that for another 24 hours or so, you might be open to rethinking what your party stands for. So, while I have your attention, here's an idea.
Go back to being the party of responsibility.
I'm not talking about scolding people. I'm talking about rewarding them. Be the party that rewards ordinary people who do what they're supposed to do—and protects them from those who don't.
If you think this kind of moral talk is anathema, you're the sort of person Karl Rove wants to be running the Democratic Party. Get out, or get a new attitude. Nearly 60 million people came out to vote for George W. Bush yesterday because they think that he represents their values and that you don't. Prove them wrong and you'll be the majority party again.
How? Start by changing the way you talk about pocketbook issues. Remember Bill Clinton's commitment to help people who "work hard and play by the rules"? Your positions on taxes and labor would be assets instead of liabilities if you explained them in moral terms. The minimum wage rewards work. Repealing the estate tax helps rich people get richer without risk or effort. Lax corporate oversight allows big businesses to evade taxes, deceive small investors, and raid pension funds.
Yes, Republicans will accuse you of waging a class war. I can see you cringing already. Get off your knees and fight. It is a war, but it isn't a class war. It's a culture war, and if you talk about it that way, you'll win it.
Some of you are dismayed by the emergence of a huge voting bloc of churchgoers. Stop viewing this as a threat, and start viewing it as an opportunity. Socially conservative blue-collar workers don't believe in the free market. They believe in the work ethic. Bush wins their votes by equating the free market with the work ethic. Show them where the free market betrays the work ethic, and they'll vote for the party of the work ethic—you—against the party of the free market.
What's your strongest issue among these voters? Outsourcing. Why? Because it's the issue on which you talk most naturally about right and wrong. It's also the issue on which you're most comfortable appealing to nationalism. That's another lesson you need to learn. People are voting Republican because they think you're weak. And, let's face it, you are weak. You say you'll defend this country, but then you go on about consulting other governments, cultivating goodwill, and playing well with others. You make a world full of terrorists sound like kindergarten.
Democrats in the Roosevelt-Truman years didn't have this problem. They called tyrants by their name, and they didn't sound like they were faking it. A party that believes in right and wrong at home must be assertive about right and wrong abroad. You need a serious antiterrorist agenda. Otherwise, when you object to a war like Iraq, you sound like the peace party.
I'm not asking you to act like you care about this stuff. I'm asking you to care about it for real, and not just at election time. When a Republican president runs a TV ad accusing you of failing to protect us from wolves, you should be able to point out that he's the one who emptied our shotgun into a fox, leaving us helpless against the wolves. And you should sound credible saying it.
Once you eliminate the sincerity gap between you and the Republicans on national security, you can exploit the reverse sincerity gap between you and them on responsibility. Think about the values of our armed forces: shared risk, shared sacrifice, and reciprocal duty between officers and soldiers, regardless of race or class. Those are your values.
When leaders betray troops through bad planning and false pretenses for war, that should be your issue. When Republicans cut taxes for the rich while the nation is at war and the Treasury is empty, that should be your issue. When soldiers from poor families die while corporations skim from the war budget, that should be your issue. I've heard John Kerry talk about each of these issues separately, but each time, he sounded opportunistic. To be powerful, they must flow from a common message. That message is responsibility.
All the issues Democrats like to run on—education, the environment, the deficit, energy independence—would be vastly more powerful if united under a single theme. Clean up your mess. Take care of your children. Pay your debts. Stand on your own two feet. It all comes down to responsibility.
The Democrat who talks this way most naturally is John Edwards. (I know, I've got to stop advertising for him.) He's the one who frames every issue in terms of values. He's the one who argued during the presidential primaries that Republicans were favoring unearned wealth over work. He's the one who connected Republican tax policies to make the point. You don't have to teach him the language, because he learned it growing up in one of those red states.
So, there's your candidate, and there's your message. Now go and live it, so you won't have to fake it.
Hitchens: The "War on Terrorism" Didn't Cause the Fort Hood Shootings
Enter Slate's Write-Like-Sarah Palin Contest
Whoa! The House Health Care Bill Is Actually Less Expensive Than the Senate's.
Like Israel but Colder: The Jewish Autonomous Region of Russia
Why Everyone Should Read When Everything Changed
Spitzer: How Tim Geithner Was Fleeced by Wall Street
Remarks from the Fray:
Out here in the sticks, our greatest fear is that the city slickers are trying to pull one over on us. We are suspicious about class warfare, because it naturally appeals most to those who never worked a hard day in their lives. Most of the rich people we know are smart and work hard. Most of the poor people we know are dumb and lazy. John Kerry, who looks faker than a $10 Stetson in his barn jacket, wants us to vote alongside our Uncle Billy, who is always looking for a handout.
Edwards flips that argument by talking about corporate welfare and tax cuts for the rich. But even moreso, he talks about the myriad of ways the wealthy seek to manipulate the system--how they use their wealth and influence in ways the middle class cannot. He can explain why the deficit spending is good for the rich and bad for your kids, and he can explain it in 30 seconds. He can explain how Democrats are for responsible people like you, who have always taken care of your family and your job, while the Republican are the lazy folks who want you to pay for their mistakes.
But most of all, Saletan is right because he knows that most of the Democratic leadership does not believe any of this. Only when that leadership changes will the Democrats retake Washington.
--dubyadee
(To reply, click here)
Saletan thinks you can presto chango pocket book issues into the values issues which moved the election. You can't, especially when the economy's growing at about 4% a quarter and joblessness is 5%.
If the Democratic party wants to capitalize on values, or at least neutralize the issue, they need to nominate a moderate on these issues. Think Lieberman with more charisma. Then they might be able to make hay with the rest of their platform.
Does that mean taking a scalpel to the agenda to remove the most radical cultural issues? Yes, it does. Gay marriage: forget about it. Partial birth abortion: it's barbaric infanticide; take a reasonable position. Who knows what new piece of social engineering they'll be advocating in 2008. Euthanasia. Human cloning.
Dems, stop trying to turn us into Holland and you'll win the White House.
--MarkBrown
(To reply, click here)
[Edwards] didn't even deliver his home state. Just how clear, and, more importantly, effective is the Edwards message?
--The_Curmudgeon
(To reply, click here)
(11/3)