Slate's Bizbox
politics: Who's winning, who's losing, and why.

JiltedThe Bush brothers kick Katherine Harris to the curb.

By Brian Montopoli
Posted Thursday, June 30, 2005, at 5:16 PM ET
Don't leave me this way Click image to expand.

Odds are that you haven't thought about Katherine Harris for a while. When she was Florida secretary of state in 2000, of course, Harris' maneuvering helped George W. Bush carry Florida, and with it the presidency. For her role in the election, she was skewered as nakedly partisan and parodied on Saturday Night Live as an ambitious harpy caked in enough makeup to embarrass a drag queen. But Harris took her lumps, expecting the Republican Party to eventually repay her for her efforts. Instead, the president and his brother Jeb are now trying to sink her.

A little history: In 2002, Harris ran for the U.S. House of Representatives in a heavily Republican district and won. Two years later, she considered making a run for Bob Graham's Senate seat. But the White House wanted a different candidate in the race—Mel Martinez, then the secretary of Housing and Urban Development. In an effort to keep Harris out of the primary, Republicans approached her with a backroom deal, according to Florida media reports: Stay out of the 2004 race and the party will support your Senate run in 2006. Harris agreed, and Martinez ascended to the Senate.

Earlier this month, Harris announced, right on time, that she would indeed make a 2006 run for Florida's second Senate seat, now held by Democrat Bill Nelson. But the Republicans she counted on haven't lined up behind her—they've been actively looking for other potential candidates, among them retired Army Gen. Tommy Franks and Florida House Speaker Allan Bense. Karl Rove, White House senior policy adviser and deputy chief of staff, has gotten personally involved in recruiting Bense, according to Republicans quoted by the Orlando Sentinel. This week, Bense went to Washington to meet with Rove and National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair Elisabeth Dole. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, meanwhile, has said that Bense would "be an awesome candidate if he decides to run; he's been a spectacular speaker." When asked about Harris, the governor has displayed a notable lack of enthusiasm, often talking as if she might not really be running.

Republicans seem to want Harris out of the race because they don't think she can win. Two recent polls showed Harris trailing Nelson by 17 points and 12 points respectively, even though the incumbent is considered vulnerable. Republicans may well worry that Harris, who remains a polarizing figure, could not only lose an important race but also hurt other GOP candidates in Florida, and possibly around the nation. Democrats have already tried to take advantage; a recent e-mail fund-raising plea from the liberal group America Coming Together asked ominously, "Remember Katherine Harris of Florida in 2000? Now imagine Senator Katherine Harris."

Despite the pressure from on high, Harris doesn't seem inclined to play the good soldier this time. "We're absolutely in the race," Adam Goodman, her political consultant, told me. Harris is a powerful fund-raiser, and she will be tough to beat in a primary, whatever Jeb Bush and the White House do. And if Bense were to take out Harris, it won't be easy for him to topple Nelson. Bense has little name recognition in Florida—as he told the Sentinel, "Outside of Panama City and a four-block radius around the Capitol, I'm an unknown person"—and he did even more poorly than Harris in one of the recent polls, coming in on the losing end of a 55-26 split. His defenders say he'll rise in the polls as voters get to know him. But Harris would likely also improve her standing as Florida voters begin responding to her campaign ads rather than judging her by the lingering memory of 2000. It's possible that Bense might be a better candidate than Harris in a general election—she is not, truth be told, considered a particularly competent politician in the state. But she has never lost a race, and the case for Bense is far from a slam-dunk.

Yet Jeb and George W. are apparently kicking Harris to the curb without the slightest reservation. Considering that without her, the president might be back on his ranch telling stories about the time he came this close to beating Al Gore, the Bush brothers' disaffection for Harris more than undercuts the president's legendary reputation for loyalty.

Certainly, many of the people who have stood by the president have been rewarded: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who has been with Bush since he was Texas governor, rose on the strength of his allegiance to the president, as well as his willingness to risk his neck for Bush. Condoleezza Rice went before the 9/11 commission to defend the president during the 2004 presidential campaign, took perhaps the most humiliating hits of her career, and was promptly promoted to Secretary of State.

But Harris is a better test of Bush fealty than Gonzales or Rice. In promoting them, Bush did himself and his party a favor—he put a Hispanic and an African-American into high-profile positions at a time when the party wanted to appear more inclusive. Standing by someone you like when it's politically expedient isn't a powerful show of loyalty; standing by someone you owe, regardless of the expediencies, is. Maybe another carrot is being dangled before Harris if she steps out of the Senate race. But if she goes for it, she's a fool. The evidence suggests her loyalty won't ever be repaid in kind.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Brian Montopoli is a reporter with Columbia Journalism Review's CJR Daily.
Photograph of Katherine Harris by George McGinn/Getty Images.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Remarks from the Fray:

There is one big difference between Kathleen Harris and the two examples mentioned, Gonzalez and Rice. Harris is basically an outsider. Yes, Bush is fiercely loyal to those within "the family" of trusted Bush backers. But unlike Gonzalez and Rice, Harris has never been on intimate terms with the President (get your mind out of the gutter!). Both Rice and Gonzalez served as advisers to Bush even before he became President, and both are intertwined into the "Bush family" that stretches across administrations.

Harris, on the other hand, is a 'nobody' outsider who just happened to do Bush a good turn. To use a Mafia analogy, whacking someone for the family doesn't necessarily make you a "made guy." She got her payoff, but it doesn't include membership in the very cozy and tight club surrounding the Bush family. As for the "promises" ostensibly made to her by the Republican party, they aren't worth the paper they weren't written on.

Welcome to politics, Kathleen.

--fozzy

(To reply, click here)


…Politics is an ever-morphing entity, a "wilderness of mirrors" where the only valuable outcome is to win, right or wrong … The powers-that-be in the White House are long-term strategists. They were the same 30 years ago and a dogged determination to turn America to the Right has paid off handsomely in recent years.

…Kat Harris would be a shoe-in if those in charge thought she had a reasonable chance to take one more seat for the Conservatives in '06. It's not disloyalty, just pragmatism. If Sonny Bono could be a legislator, anyone can be a legislator, including Kat Harris. Hell, she already is one.

Now...the next big thing is, can she win for the GOP in '06 or not? Someone in charge of allocating limited resources has to decide that, and that will be the ultimate point on which enthusiastic support from the Brothers Bush and the GOP will wax or wane.

Bush "loyalty" like any other political variant of that term, is spread over a hierarchy of considerations. The highest and most important is loyalty to the preservation of power by the majority party.

If the powers think Kat Harris can contribute to that "loyalty" she will get all the support she needs to win.

--JayDAMN

(To reply, click here)

(7/1)